Mumbai, Aug 17 (IANS) In Bollywood, it is mostly the male superstar who is the crowd-puller of a film -- the primary draw whose name ensures blockbuster business. On the other hand, films with female actors in the lead, often witness poor box-office performance, or have to be produced in a medium-to-low budget set-up, so that they can make profits quickly and at least record a hit status.
Vidya Balan hoped the situation would change, while speaking at a promotional event for her new film, "Mission Mangal", which stars Akshay Kumar and also features Sonakshi Sinha, Taapsee Pannu, Kirti Kulhari and Nithya Menen in key roles.
"There is no denying that the biggest star in this film and one of the biggest stars in the country is Akshay Kumar. When you talk about the business of a film, you talk in terms of the male actor. But things are changing, we have been headlining films, our films are doing well. Hopefully, in a few years, this change will also happen. But as of today, when you talk about the business of a film, you do say that an Akshay Kumar film has earned this much," said Viyda, when quizzed on why films with actresses in the lead do not get a huge box office opening.
Vidya found logic why the success of a film starring a male superstar as Akshay should be credited primarily to him. "You can't take it away from him. Look at the business his films have done over the years. I'll be foolish to say, 'oh they didn't take my name', but hopefully someday (the change will take place). I am hopeful because I have seen things change drastically in the past ten years," she said.
Director Jagan Shakti's "Mission Mangal" managed to collect Rs 29.16 crore on its opening day on Thursday, but the figures fell to Rs 17.28 crore on Friday.
Vidya, however, insisted she didn't think in terms of numbers while judging a film's success. "I am happy because the film is being loved so much. From the time it was narrated to me, I knew it is going to be a good film. I just wanted it to do well. I don't think in terms of numbers -- as in (its collection on) the first day or second day. All through, even during the making (of the film) and promotions, I felt there is good energy around this film. I am so happy and excited to see that the film is doing well," said the actress.
"Mission Mangal" is Vidya Balan's third film with Akshay Kumar after the "Heyy Babyy" and "Bhool Bhulaiyaa". Asked why don't they pair up more frequently, the actress said that they don't get offers together. At this point, Akshay Kumar, who was also present at the event, interrupted her, saying: "I wanted her in two or three projects but she said she was getting married."
On hearing this, the actress burst into laughter and asked: "So, you don't work with married heroines?"
By Nikhila Natarajan
New York, Feb 19 (IANS) The visual spectacle of Donald Trump and Narendra Modi sharing the stage in India later this month is a victory in itself, with or without the underpinning of a trade deal, US-India strategy mavens in Washington DC previewing Trumps February 24-25 visit are saying.
"The fact that the trip is happening at all is a success for India-US relations. There was a great deal of speculation that the visit would be tied to the completion of an India-US trade deal that has been the subject of years of gruelling negotiations. I commend President Trump for deciding to make the visit with or without a trade deal," Jeff Smith, South Asia Research Fellow at Heritage Foundation in Washington DC told IANS.
With Trump's top negotiator Robert Lighthizer avoiding a New Delhi trip, hopes for a "gold standard" trade deal have quickly gone south. Lighthizer has worked behind the scenes on Trump's most ambitious trade deals, including most recently with China, Mexico and Canada.
Experts are now focusing on how Trump and Modi are going to drive home the message that some of the recent trade irritants have been smoothened out.
"So, we know what the gold standard looks like. But for a program like this (Trump's India visit), as long as the two leaders have something to say about what that they need to do and that they've got 80 percent of the way there, that would count as a victory," Richard Rossow, Senior Adviser and Wadhwani Chair in US India Policy Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told IANS.
Rossow said, "A general announcement about the main principles of the agreement seems to be enough where they can claim victory, even as a lot of businesses will be scratching their heads after the fact!".
According to Jeff Smith, "Just having President Trump present to give a speech, get some face time with Prime Minister Modi, and sign some bilateral deals, including defence sales, will mark a success for bilateral relations. Of course, if the two sides are able to finalise a trade deal at the last minute, the visit will be considered an even greater success."
Trump will be the fourth consecutive president to travel to India. At this time, sources both in Washington DC and New Delhi are pointing to ever closer alignment on the lion's share of bilateral trade issues but closure is proving elusive despite many months of painful negotiations. Market access for agricultural products including dairy and India's push for reinstatement of Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) status headline the gaps between the two sides.
Trump on Tuesday said that he's saving the big trade deal for later in the year, repeating his stock lines "we're not treated very well by India" and "I happen to like Prime Minister Modi a lot."
Despite a lot of attention from US lawmakers about the situation in Kashmir after the revocation of Article 370, Rossow said the US administration has largely stuck with what it considers its "broad mandate", pushing hard on commercial interests and security cooperation with India.
Trump's visit comes against the backdrop of trade hostilities between the two countries that have escalated since the Trump administration slapped tariffs on steel and aluminium from India, in 2018. Plenty of baggage has been piled on since then. Delhi held off from immediate retaliation but finally allowed retaliatory tariffs to kick in June 2019 after the Trump administration revoked India's Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) status early 2019. The GSP gives duty-free market access to exports from developing countries. In November 2018, US cranked up the pressure on countries importing oil from Iran, handed a six month waiver to India and then slammed the brakes altogether in Spring 2019. In October 2018, India signed a $5.5 billion deal to buy Russian S-400 air defence systems, which will begin arriving late 2020. The Trump administration's CAATSA strikes at the heart of this deal and there are no guarantees yet of a waiver for India.
US goods exports to India in 2018 were $33.5 billion, up 30.6 per cent from 2017 and up 89.5 per cent from 2008. US exports to India account for 2 per cent of overall US exports in 2018. US total exports of agricultural products to India totalled $1.5 billion in 2018. Leading export categories include tree nuts ($663 million), cotton ($333 million), fresh fruit ($163 million), dairy products ($48 million), and prepared food ($33 million).
(Nikhila Natarajan can be contacted at @byniknat)